<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>REALscience &#187; Science of&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realscience.us/category/science-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realscience.us</link>
	<description>Brings science to life. This audio and video news site goes beyond the headlines to report and analyze science as it applies to our lives. REALscience creates and collects the best science news from around the Internet and delivers it to you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>mbradbury@realscience.us (Michael Bradbury/REALscience)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>mbradbury@realscience.us (Michael Bradbury/REALscience)</webMaster>
	<category>Science</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:new-feed-url>http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id251036208</itunes:new-feed-url>
	<itunes:subtitle>Bringing science to life.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Brings science to life. This audio and video news site goes beyond the headlines to report and analyze science as it applies to our lives. REALscience creates and collects the best science news from around the Internet and delivers it to you.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>real, science, science, science, news, space, biology, physics</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Science &#38; Medicine" />
	<itunes:category text="Science &#38; Medicine">
		<itunes:category text="Natural Sciences" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>mbradbury@realscience.us</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.realscience.us/images/webbanner1_sm.png" />
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Fall Foliage</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2011/10/13/science-of-fall-foliage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2011/10/13/science-of-fall-foliage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/?p=5221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For leaf peepers Fall is the time for the best leaves. They turn from bright green to yellow, then orange and if the conditions are right red and purple too. But what makes fall colors so spectacular?
Science can explain.
First just about everybody knows that chlorophyll gives leaves their green color. But chlorophyll is more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/SPRyk2ZgBss?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p>For <a href="http://www.leafpeepers.com/contents.htm">leaf peepers</a> Fall is the time for the best leaves. They turn from bright green to yellow, then orange and if the conditions are right red and purple too. But what makes fall colors so spectacular?</p>
<p>Science can explain.</p>
<p>First just about everybody knows that chlorophyll gives leaves their green color. But chlorophyll is more than just a molecule that gives plants a green pigment. Chlorophyll absorbs sunlight and uses its energy to create carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water. Trees drink in water through their roots and they breathe in carbon dioxide from the air.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>That process we all know is called photosynthesis. It&#8217;s what all land-based and many sea-based plants rely on for food. That&#8217;s why we call leaves nature&#8217;s food factories.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/photosynthesis.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-5224 aligncenter" title="photosynthesis" src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/photosynthesis.jpg" alt="photosynthesis" width="468" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>Like all things in nature plants and trees are built for efficiency. As the hours of sunlight decrease during the second half of the year <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deciduous">deciduous trees</a> begin to conserve energy so they don&#8217;t freeze during the winter. They accomplish this by shedding their leaves. But each tree doesn&#8217;t consciously decide to drop the excess baggage. That&#8217;s also part of the process which leads to fall foliage being so brilliant.</p>
<p>Before dropping their leaves, trees slow down production in their food factories by producing less chlorophyll. That allows other colors to become visible. First, the yellow pigment which was there all along begins to emerge. That is created by molecules called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carotenoid">carotenoids</a>. The two common leaf carotenoids are carotene and xanthophyll.</p>
<p>They are the pigments that gives carrots and sweet potatoes their color. Carotenoids are masked by chlorophyll until fall approaches. When the chlorophyll production slows down carotenoids become visible. They are responsible for yellow and orange leaves.</p>
<p>Ever present but hidden by other colors is another pigment called anthocyanin. Anthocyanin is part of a third pigment family called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flavonoid">flavonoids</a>. Lycopene is a flavonoid that gives tomatoes their red color. But anthocyanin acts as the natural sunscreen for plants, blocking harmful ultraviolet rays from the sun. As chlorophyll production shuts down for the year, anthocyanin production ramps up. These give tree leaves their deep red, magenta and purple colors. That increase in anthocyanin is in response to surging sugar concentrations, building up in the leaves.</p>
<p>That glucose glut tends to concentrate where leaf meets stem, making the extra weight a target point for wind or rain to knock the leaves from the trees. After all, that&#8217;s the trees&#8217; goal. Get rid of the leaves so they can survive the sunless winter without dying of starvation or freezing to death.</p>
<p>While trees go through this incredibly complicated process to get ready for winter, we marvel at their transformation from vibrant green blowing in the mid-summer sun to yellows, oranges, reds and purples buffeted by fall storms. Perhaps we watch in awe as the slow and steady march of time goes on before our very eyes.</p>
<p><strong>Key Leaf Chemistry</strong></p>
<p>The color of leaf we get is highly dependent on the types and amounts of pigments that are present. Internal plant chemical interactions, especially from variable soil acidity or pH level can have a dramatic impact on leaf color.</p>
<p>With the steadily decreasing length of day and cooler temperatures as fall approaches trees biologically trigger the formation of a corky layer of cells called the <a href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1712/abscission-layer">abcission layer</a> across the base of the leaf where it attaches to the tree. This formation gradually decreases the supply of water and minerals to the leaf, reduces the manufacture of chlorophyll and traps sugars in the leaf.</p>
<p>In some trees, like maples, glucose is trapped in the leaves after photosynthesis stops. Sunlight during the day and the cool nights of autumn cause the leaves turn this glucose into a red color. With enough sunny days, those anthocyanins turn leaves bright reds and purples.</p>
<p>The muted brown color of oak leaves is made from wastes left in those leaves.</p>
<p>Why is so hard to predict when the leaves will be the best and brightest? In short, it depends on the weather.</p>
<p>Warm wet springs, summers that don&#8217;t scorch and bright sunny fall days with cool nights all lend to the brilliance of fall color. The degree of visual splendor and leaf vibrancy requires a lot of variables lining up just right. And when they do, the beauty is unparalleled.</p>
<blockquote><h3>Phenology of Fall Foliage</h3>
<p>Phenology is the study of the timing of nature. This ranges from the dates that tulips bloom in the spring to the fall migration of Canadian geese. And it definitely includes watching the leaves turn color in the fall.</p>
<p>But scientists have been struggling to find a direct link between later leaf drops and climate change in the U.S. Europe and Asia have been conducting studies that seem to point to later fall foliage. But it&#8217;s been a difficult case to prove in the U.S. Part of that reason could be the wildly fluctuating weather from year to year.</p>
<p>A wet spring, followed by the deluge of Hurricane Irene, a mind-summer drought and normal-ish fall have trees in New England all confused. Some tree leaves are bypassing fall colors, turning brown and dropping early. Some plant biologists believe that&#8217;s due to a fungus that relished the wetness and took hold.</p>
<p>Those factors make identifying long term trends difficult at best.</p>
<p>Several organizations are enlisting the help of the public to collect data in hopes of finding the signal for such change in the noise or fluctuating weather.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/AP087531b83bc340ddb4f10a47639f52c1.html">Wall Street Journal</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There are signs everywhere that things are changing — how is the question. Some species are being affected while others are not,&#8221; said Esperanza Stancioff of the University of Maine cooperative extension and Maine Sea Grant, who has trained 195 citizen scientists to enter data online in her &#8220;Signs of the Season&#8221; phenology project.</p>
<p>To assist both backyard observers and researchers alike, the National Phenology Network has spent the last four years coming up with standards to be used by observers in reporting foliage color changes. Final tweaks on the uniform reporting standards should be completed in a few weeks, Weltzin said.</p>
<p>Another part of the effort to study climate change through the lens of fall foliage is being conducted from space by the U.S. Geological Survey utilizing satellites from NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.</p>
<p>Right now, the effort is focused on Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, where scientists are attempting to understand the factors that go into the metrics to ensure proper analysis of the photos taken from above, said John W. Jones, a research geographer with the USGS outside of Washington, D.C.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2011/10/13/science-of-fall-foliage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Super Storms</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2011/05/24/science-of-super-storms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2011/05/24/science-of-super-storms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/?p=4309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
2011 has been the deadliest tornado year in over 50 years. Already 1,151 twisters have formed and cut a wide swath of destruction across many states. That is more than double the average. And 481 people have died as a result of severe weather this year. That is more than six times the average and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf" scale="noscale" salign="lt" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" background="#333333" width="425" height="279" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" FlashVars="si=254&#038;&#038;contentValue=50105319&#038;shareUrl=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7367073n" /></p>
<p>2011 has been the <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/05/24/us.tornado.record.year/">deadliest tornado year</a> in over 50 years. Already 1,151 twisters have formed and cut a wide swath of destruction across many states. That is more than double the average. And 481 people have died as a result of severe weather this year. That is more than six times the average and makes it the deadliest season since 1953.</p>
<p>Joplin, Missouri is the latest urban center to be demolished, following a very rare April tornado outbreak that leveled Tuscaloosa, Alabama. </p>
<p><a href="http://crest.ccny.cuny.edu/people/faculty-and-scientists/stanley-gedzelman-ph.d">Stan Gedzelman</a>, a meteorologist at the City College of New York doesn&#8217;t see anything unusual in this year&#8217;s weather pattern that would indicate an especially severe weather spring. He also believes the warning system is performing as well as it could, giving residents up to 20 minutes to prepare for an incoming tornado.</p>
<p>But he says the instability in the atmosphere that allows these super storms to form is just about as large as he&#8217;s ever seen.</p>
<p>Tornadic activity occurs when cool dry air from the north collides with warm moist air from the Gulf of Mexico. That convergences creates convection as cold air sinks and warm air rises. Spinning storm cells can spit out tornadoes.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/23/us-usa-weather-tornadoes-idUSTRE74M08L20110523">Joplin tornado</a> was an F-4 tornado with winds approaching 200 miles per hour that cut a six-mile long debris track three-quarters-of-a-mile wide through a suburban and commercial area of the city of 47,000 in the southwest corner Missouri.</p>
<p>The Associated Press science reporter Randy Schmid explains why the Joplin tornado was so destructive.<br />
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="cs_player" width="425" height="330"><param name="movie" value="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=2489212&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=2489212&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="330" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2011/05/24/science-of-super-storms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Tornadoes</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2011/05/10/science-of-tornadoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2011/05/10/science-of-tornadoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/?p=4242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Early results from the late April burst of tornadoes that ripped across the southeast, killing over 300 show that 2011 is already the third worst tornado season on record. And it isn&#8217;t over yet. The month of April broke the record for most tornadoes, as a swath of destruction tore from Oklahoma to Virginia, hitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="cs_player" width="425" height="330"><param name="movie" value="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=2448826&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=2448826&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="330" /></object></p>
<p>Early results from the late <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_25%E2%80%9328,_2011_tornado_outbreak">April burst of tornadoes</a> that ripped across the southeast, killing over 300 show that 2011 is already the third worst tornado season on record. And it isn&#8217;t over yet. The month of April broke the record for most tornadoes, as a swath of destruction tore from Oklahoma to Virginia, hitting Alabama especially hard.</p>
<p>Meteorologists have been analyzing the data associated with the tornado outbreak and have counted over 300 separate tornadoes during April 26-28, including two F-5s, the strongest that can be measured with winds over 200 mph.</p>
<p>They also explain the perfect storm that set up to create the tornado outbreak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2011/05/10/science-of-tornadoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Science of&#8230;The Winter Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2010/02/15/the-science-of-the-winter-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2010/02/15/the-science-of-the-winter-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesson plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC Learn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley Education Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/?p=3035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
San Francisco Bay area teachers are using the 2010 Winter Olympics to teach kids about math and science. 
The Silicon Valley Education Foundation teamed up with NBC Learn &#8212; the educational arm of NBC News &#8212; and the National Science Foundation to provide free lesson plans and video clips. 
For more information, visit Lessonopoly.org.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="swfclipV4014856" width="301" height="226" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=V4014856&amp;m=1151723"><param name="movie" value="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=V4014856&amp;m=1151723"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="base" value="." /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/></object></p>
<p>San Francisco Bay area teachers are using the 2010 Winter Olympics to teach kids about math and science. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.svefoundation.org/svefoundation/">The Silicon Valley Education Foundation</a> teamed up with <a href="http://www.nbclearn.com/portal/site/learn">NBC Learn</a> &#8212; the educational arm of NBC News &#8212; and the <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/">National Science Foundation</a> to provide free lesson plans and video clips. </p>
<p>For more information, visit <a href="http://www.lessonopoly.org/svef/">Lessonopoly.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2010/02/15/the-science-of-the-winter-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Heat Wave</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2009/08/03/science-ofheat-wave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2009/08/03/science-ofheat-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2009/08/03/science-ofheat-wave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The western half of North America has been baking in a heat wave that shattered all-time records while the east coast is shivering in one of the coldest summers on record.
A giant ridge of high pressure and a giant low pressure trough that span the continent set up and became locked, creating a formidable weather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/103degreesthermometer.jpg" width="325" height="163" alt="103degreesthermometer.jpg" class="imageframe" style="float:left;" /></p>
<p>The western half of North America has been baking in a heat wave that shattered all-time records while the east coast is shivering in one of the coldest summers on record.</p>
<p>A giant ridge of high pressure and a giant low pressure trough that span the continent set up and became locked, creating a formidable weather pattern that has everyone talking. </p>
<p>And many are wondering whether the record-breaking 103 temperature is the first evidence of global warming in Seattle.</p>
<p>Listen here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2009/08/03/science-ofheat-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/science_of_heat_wave_080309.mp3" length="5206413" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:07:14</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The western half of North America has been baking in a heat wave that shattered all-time records while the east coast is shivering in one of the coldest summers on record.
A giant ridge of high pressure and a giant low pressure trough that span the[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The western half of North America has been baking in a heat wave that shattered all-time records while the east coast is shivering in one of the coldest summers on record.
A giant ridge of high pressure and a giant low pressure trough that span the continent set up and became locked, creating a formidable weather pattern that has everyone talking. 
And many are wondering whether the record-breaking 103 temperature is the first evidence of global warming in Seattle.
Listen here. </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Climate, SciClips</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2009/07/24/science-ofhealth-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2009/07/24/science-ofhealth-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
<category>comparative effectiveness research</category><category>evidence based medicine</category><category>group health cooperative</category><category>health care rationing</category><category>health care reform</category><category>legislation</category><category>Obama</category><category>stimulus money</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2009/07/24/science-ofhealth-care-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As Congress tackles one of the most important and expensive revamps of the American health care system, some are attacking the science used to measure how effective treatments are.
This research&#8211;known as comparative effectiveness research&#8211;does not attempt to ration health care. And, could even be the key to reducing overall health care costs.
President Obama has challenged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/medicinemoney.jpg" alt="medicinemoney.jpg" style="float: left" class="imageframe" height="227" width="325" /></p>
<p>As Congress tackles one of the most important and expensive revamps of the American health care system, some are attacking the science used to measure how effective treatments are.</p>
<p>This research&#8211;known as comparative effectiveness research&#8211;does not attempt to ration health care. And, could even be the key to reducing overall health care costs.</p>
<p>President Obama has challenged Congress to resolve health care reform bills currently wending their way through the House and Senate by the fall. In his national news conference on Wednesday, the President endorsed evidence-based medicine as a means to streamline health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2009/07/24/science-ofhealth-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/science_of_health_care_reform_072409.mp3" length="8037355" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:11:10</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
As Congress tackles one of the most important and expensive revamps of the American health care system, some are attacking the science used to measure how effective treatments are.
This research&#8211;known as comparative effectiveness research[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
As Congress tackles one of the most important and expensive revamps of the American health care system, some are attacking the science used to measure how effective treatments are.
This research&#8211;known as comparative effectiveness research&#8211;does not attempt to ration health care. And, could even be the key to reducing overall health care costs.
President Obama has challenged Congress to resolve health care reform bills currently wending their way through the House and Senate by the fall. In his national news conference on Wednesday, the President endorsed evidence-based medicine as a means to streamline health care.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Politics, SciClips</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Star Trek</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2009/05/13/science-ofstar-trek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2009/05/13/science-ofstar-trek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antimatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extrasolar planets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keck Antimatter Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelvin Lynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2009/05/13/science-ofstar-trek/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The new Star Trek movie is fueling a science fiction discussion about what technologies could eventually become science fact. The ability to travel at warp speed&#8211;the speed of light is at the root of this discussion. Is it possible and if so when?
Well, yes and no. Some scientists believe that the science involved does not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/plasmarocket.jpg" width="325" height="228" alt="plasmarocket.jpg" class="imageframe" style="float:left;" /></p>
<p>The new Star Trek movie is fueling a science fiction discussion about what technologies could eventually become science fact. The ability to travel at warp speed&#8211;the speed of light is at the root of this discussion. Is it possible and if so when?</p>
<p>Well, yes and no. Some scientists believe that the science involved does not violate the laws of physics but there still is a long way to go before intergalactic travel becomes a reality.</p>
<p>Two scientists at Washington State University&#8211;dubbed the positron pair&#8211;are working to contain antimatter so they can control the immense energy created when electrons and the their antimatter counterparts positrons cancel each other out in the process of annihilation. </p>
<p>That sounds like science fiction but that science fact is already improving medical devices, computers and may power space ships to send to the center of the Milky Way&#8230;someday.</p>
<p>Listen here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2009/05/13/science-ofstar-trek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/science_of_star_trek_051309.mp3" length="5378508" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:07:28</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The new Star Trek movie is fueling a science fiction discussion about what technologies could eventually become science fact. The ability to travel at warp speed&#8211;the speed of light is at the root of this discussion. Is it possible and if so w[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The new Star Trek movie is fueling a science fiction discussion about what technologies could eventually become science fact. The ability to travel at warp speed&#8211;the speed of light is at the root of this discussion. Is it possible and if so when?
Well, yes and no. Some scientists believe that the science involved does not violate the laws of physics but there still is a long way to go before intergalactic travel becomes a reality.
Two scientists at Washington State University&#8211;dubbed the positron pair&#8211;are working to contain antimatter so they can control the immense energy created when electrons and the their antimatter counterparts positrons cancel each other out in the process of annihilation. 
That sounds like science fiction but that science fact is already improving medical devices, computers and may power space ships to send to the center of the Milky Way&#8230;someday.
Listen here. </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Astronomy, Biology, Environment, SciClips, Space, Video</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Science of&#8230;Running</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2009/04/06/the-science-ofrunning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2009/04/06/the-science-ofrunning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athletes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrolyte imbalances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayo Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2009/04/06/the-science-ofrunning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Running a marathon can be a grueling effort, even for well-trained athletes. Runners can suffer electrolyte imbalances and even kidney problems. An important factor in all this is hydration. But how much and what should runners drink? Those are questions doctors at Mayo Clinic want to answer. They&#8217;re studying the effects running has on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="swfclipV3667781" width="421" height="376" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=V3667781&amp;m=822469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=V3667781&amp;m=822469"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="base" value="." /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/></object></p>
<p>Running a marathon can be a grueling effort, even for well-trained athletes. Runners can suffer electrolyte imbalances and even kidney problems. An important factor in all this is hydration. But how much and what should runners drink? Those are questions doctors at Mayo Clinic want to answer. They&#8217;re studying the effects running has on the human body in hopes of being able to tell runners and other endurance athletes how best to prepare for an event.</p>
<p>And with marathon season nearly upon us, take care and stay hydrated during your run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2009/04/06/the-science-ofrunning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chemistry of Love</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2009/03/04/chemistry-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2009/03/04/chemistry-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dopamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serotonin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testosterone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why-Him-Her-Understanding-Personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2009/03/04/chemistry-of-love/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Dr. Helen Fisher, the author of Why Him, Why Her talks about the power of love&#8211;from a chemical point of view. The chemicals dopamine, serotonin, estrogen, and testosterone and are powerful forces in attracting a mate.
Does the opposites-attract idea hold up under scientific scrutiny? Or is like drawn to like? The answer? It depends who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="swfclipV3638337" width="421" height="376" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=V3638337&amp;m=798993"><param name="movie" value="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=V3638337&amp;m=798993"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="base" value="." /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.helenfisher.com/">Dr. Helen Fisher</a>, the author of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Why-Him-Her-Understanding-Personality/dp/0805082921/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1236367121&#038;sr=11-1">Why Him, Why Her</a></em> talks about the power of love&#8211;from a chemical point of view. The chemicals dopamine, serotonin, estrogen, and testosterone and are powerful forces in attracting a mate.</p>
<p>Does the opposites-attract idea hold up under scientific scrutiny? Or is like drawn to like? The answer? It depends who you are. Find out your chemical profile, based on the research of this anthropologist and scientific advisor for dating site <a href="http://www.chemistry.com/">Chemistry.com</a>.</p>
<p>Flickr photo courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/squidminion/">squidminion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2009/03/04/chemistry-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Freeze</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2009/01/15/science-offreeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2009/01/15/science-offreeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backyard Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celsius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth System Science Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freeze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntsville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Christy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Nina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Alabama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2009/01/15/science-offreeze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
December 2008 Global Temperatures

According to official numbers, 2008 is the coldest year on record since 2000 (and it is still .05 degrees Celsius warmer than seasonal averages) because of the influence of La Nina cooling pattern in the Pacific Ocean. 
And winter has been brutal so far, with temperatures dropping to record low levels. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1208-tempmap.jpg" width="325" height="222" alt="1208-tempmap.jpg" />
<div class="imagecaption">December 2008 Global Temperatures</div>
</div>
<p>According to official numbers, 2008 is the coldest year on record since 2000 (and it is still .05 degrees Celsius warmer than seasonal averages) because of the influence of La Nina cooling pattern in the Pacific Ocean. </p>
<p>And winter has been brutal so far, with temperatures dropping to record low levels. The cold in the upper Midwest and East coast this week is just the latest in a string of frigid storms coast to coast. (And all this is happening during a solar miniumum.)</p>
<p><strong>Just in: </strong>From University of Alabama, Huntsville, December 2008 temperatures (preliminary)</p>
<p>Global composite temp.: +0.18 C (about 0.32 degrees Fahrenheit) above<br />
20-year average for December.</p>
<p>Northern Hemisphere: +0.41 C (about 0.74 degrees Fahrenheit) above 20-year<br />
average for December.</p>
<p>Southern Hemisphere: -0.05 C (about 0.09 degrees Fahrenheit) below 20-year<br />
average for December.</p>
<p>November temperatures (revised):<br />
Global Composite: +0.25 C above 20-year average<br />
Northern Hemisphere: +0.34 C above 20-year average<br />
Southern Hemisphere: +0.16 C above 20-year average</p>
<p>(All temperature variations are based on a 20-year average (1979-1998) for<br />
the month reported.)</p>
<p>Notes on data released Jan. 12, 2009:</p>
<p>The eleventh warmest global December in 31 years was also the fifth warmest<br />
in the Northern Hemisphere, according to Dr. John Christy, a professor of<br />
atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC)<br />
at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. At the same time, the Southern<br />
Hemisphere saw its tenth coolest of the past 31 Decembers.</p>
<p>WARMEST DECEMBERS, NH<br />
2003 +0.62 C<br />
2006 +0.54 C<br />
1987 +0.52 C<br />
1998 +0.42 C<br />
2008 +0.41 C<br />
2005 +0.40 C</p>
<p>Since November 1978, the Northern Hemisphere atmosphere has warmed more than<br />
three times as fast as the Southern Hemisphere atmosphere (+0.19 C to +0.06<br />
C per decade).</p>
<p>With a global average temperature that was 0.05 C warmer than seasonal<br />
norms, 2008 goes into the books as the coolest year since 2000. Global<br />
temperatures during 2008 were influenced by a La Nina Pacific Ocean cooling<br />
event.</p>
<p>Another La Nina appears to be forming in the Pacific, which could chill<br />
temperatures through 2009.</p>
<p>Color maps of temperature anomalies available on-line at:<br />
<a href="http://climate.uah.edu/">http://climate.uah.edu/</a></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/voxant_player.js?a=V3609340&#038;m=754226&#038;w=420&#038;h=375&#038;v=2"></script><br />
If you are out in real cold&#8211;say when it&#8217;s 11 or 12 below zero&#8211;here are few experiments you can do to stay warm.</p>
<p>Bryan Wunar visits from the <a href="http://www.msichicago.org/">Museum of Science and Industry</a> in Chicago to share some great experiments in the cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2009/01/15/science-offreeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;a Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-of-a-recession-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-of-a-recession-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Feldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bureau of Economic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorum Bauman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The National Bureau of Economic Research announced that a recession began in December 2007. It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/recession.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="recession.jpg"><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/recession.jpg" width="640" height="480" alt="recession.jpg" class="imageframe" style="float:left;" /></a></p>
<p>The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The <a href="http://www.nber.org/">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> announced that a recession began in December 2007. It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-of-a-recession-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/science_of_a_recession_120208.mp3" length="" type="" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;a Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-ofa-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-ofa-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Feldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bureau of Economic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorum Bauman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-ofa-recession/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The National Bureau of Economic Research announced that a recession began in December 2007. 
It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/recession.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="recession.jpg"><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/recession.jpg" width="325" height="244" alt="recession.jpg" class="imageframe" style="float:left;" /></a></p>
<p>The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The <a href="http://www.nber.org/">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> announced that a recession began in December 2007. </p>
<p>It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/12/02/science-ofa-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/science_of_a_recession_120208.mp3" length="5915481" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The National Bureau of Economic Research announced that a recession began in December 2007. 
It took a year of housing foreclo[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The National Bureau of Economic Research announced that a recession began in December 2007. 
It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year run.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Podcast, Politics, SciClips</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;a Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/09/07/science-of-a-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/09/07/science-of-a-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Cycle Dating Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Feldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoram Bauman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The National Bureau of Economic Research announced that a recession began in December 2007. It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/recession.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="recession.jpg"><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/recession.jpg" width="640" height="480" alt="recession.jpg" class="imageframe" style="float:left;" /></a></p>
<p>The United States is in a recession. The signs are all around. But how is an official recession calculated or determined? The <a href="http://www.nber.org/">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> announced that a recession began in December 2007. It took a year of housing foreclosures, bank failures and massive layoffs to slow economic growth after a long 15-year run.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/science_of_a_recession_120208.mp3" rel="lightbox" title="science_of_a_recession_120208.mp3">science_of_a_recession_120208.mp3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/09/07/science-of-a-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Fizz</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/06/13/science-offizz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/06/13/science-offizz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backyard Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alka Seltzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachian State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet Coke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fizz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifesavers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sophmores]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2008/06/13/science-offizz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diet Coke + Mentos = Physics of Fizz
[kml_flashembed movie="
At last, a science-based reason to show the famous Diet Coke-Mentos geyser video from YouTube! A group of college Sophomores in North Carolina decided to study the physics of this pop culture experiment. 
And, their work is published in the June issue of American Journal of Physics.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Diet Coke + Mentos = Physics of Fizz</h2>
<p><code>[kml_flashembed movie="<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hKoB0MHVBvM&#038;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hKoB0MHVBvM&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></code></p>
<p>At last, a science-based reason to show the famous Diet Coke-Mentos geyser video from YouTube! A group of college Sophomores in North Carolina decided to study the physics of this pop culture experiment. </p>
<p>And, their work is published in the June issue of <a href="http://scitation.aip.org/ajp/">American Journal of Physics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/06/13/science-offizz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/science_of_fizz_061308.mp3" length="2034416" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:02:50</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Diet Coke + Mentos = Physics of Fizz
[kml_flashembed movie="
At last, a science-based reason to show the famous Diet Coke-Mentos geyser video from YouTube! A group of college Sophomores in North Carolina decided to study the physics of this pop cult[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Diet Coke + Mentos = Physics of Fizz
[kml_flashembed movie="
At last, a science-based reason to show the famous Diet Coke-Mentos geyser video from YouTube! A group of college Sophomores in North Carolina decided to study the physics of this pop culture experiment. 
And, their work is published in the June issue of American Journal of Physics.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Video</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phoenix Begins Scientific Mission</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/27/phoenix-begins-scientific-mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/27/phoenix-begins-scientific-mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide frost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Lander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotic arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Mission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/27/phoenix-begins-scientific-mission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Crater showing carbon dioxide frost, courtesy of NASA

After all the anticipation about the landing, the real work begins now that the Phoenix Lander is safely planted on Mars. 
The three-month mission gets underway this week and will search for clues to the red planet&#8217;s watery past. A robotic arm on the lander will dig up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="imageframe" style="float:left; width:133px;"><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/martiancrater.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="martiancrater.jpg"><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/martiancrater.thumbnail.jpg" width="133" height="200" alt="martiancrater.jpg" /></a>
<div class="imagecaption">Crater showing carbon dioxide frost, courtesy of NASA</div>
</div>
<p>After all the anticipation about the landing, the real work begins now that the Phoenix Lander is safely planted on Mars. </p>
<p>The three-month mission gets underway this week and will search for clues to the red planet&#8217;s watery past. A robotic arm on the lander will dig up soil and ice samples and analyze them right there on the surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/27/phoenix-begins-scientific-mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/science_of_mars_052608.mp3" length="2832196" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:03:56</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Crater showing carbon dioxide frost, courtesy of NASA

After all the anticipation about the landing, the real work begins now that the Phoenix Lander is safely planted on Mars. 
The three-month mission gets underway this week and will search for cl[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Crater showing carbon dioxide frost, courtesy of NASA

After all the anticipation about the landing, the real work begins now that the Phoenix Lander is safely planted on Mars. 
The three-month mission gets underway this week and will search for clues to the red planet&#8217;s watery past. A robotic arm on the lander will dig up soil and ice samples and analyze them right there on the surface.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Astrobiology, Astronomy, Space</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science of&#8230;Our Clear and Present Danger</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/08/science-ofour-clear-and-present-danger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/08/science-ofour-clear-and-present-danger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear and Present Danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/08/science-ofour-clear-and-present-danger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Prices are rising, food seems scarce. Wars are raging in far corners of the world. But is our present time one of more or less violence? 
A group of Maryland researchers have been following the numbers. It turns out we are living in a very peaceful time. Why doesn&#8217;t it feel like it?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/nuns_with_guns.png" rel="lightbox" title="nuns_with_guns.png"><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/nuns_with_guns.thumbnail.png" width="325" height="213" alt="nuns_with_guns.png" class="imageframe" style="float:left;" /></a></p>
<p>Prices are rising, food seems scarce. Wars are raging in far corners of the world. But is our present time one of more or less violence? </p>
<p>A group of Maryland researchers have been following the numbers. It turns out we are living in a very peaceful time. Why doesn&#8217;t it feel like it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/05/08/science-ofour-clear-and-present-danger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/science-of-our-clear-and-present-danger.mp3" length="4636839" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:06:26</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Prices are rising, food seems scarce. Wars are raging in far corners of the world. But is our present time one of more or less violence? 
A group of Maryland researchers have been following the numbers. It turns out we are living in a very peaceful[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Prices are rising, food seems scarce. Wars are raging in far corners of the world. But is our present time one of more or less violence? 
A group of Maryland researchers have been following the numbers. It turns out we are living in a very peaceful time. Why doesn&#8217;t it feel like it?</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Biology, Politics</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michio Kaku and Science of&#8230;The Impossible</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/04/04/michio-kaku-and-science-ofthe-impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/04/04/michio-kaku-and-science-ofthe-impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics and Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciLebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michio Kaku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teleportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2008/04/04/michio-kaku-and-science-ofthe-impossible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Dr. Michio Kaku examines the link between science fiction and real science. From the technological advances of teleportation in Star Trek and a death star in Star Wars, Kaku rates the impossibility of such realities in the future in his new book, Physics of the Impossible.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m5UcJt6RoIs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m5UcJt6RoIs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mkaku.org/">Dr. Michio Kaku</a> examines the link between science fiction and real science. From the technological advances of teleportation in<em> Star Trek</em> and a death star in <em>Star Wars</em>, Kaku rates the impossibility of such realities in the future in his new book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Impossible-Scientific-Exploration-Teleportation/dp/0385520697">Physics of the Impossible</a></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/04/04/michio-kaku-and-science-ofthe-impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Science of&#8230;Leap Year</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2008/02/11/the-science-ofleap-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2008/02/11/the-science-ofleap-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciClips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leap Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2008/02/11/the-science-ofleap-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
courtesy of ASU deptarments of Geography and Computer Science

This year, February 29 appears on the calendar. That&#8217;s because 2008 is a leap year. It&#8217;s just an easy way to keep our calendars clear and consistent.
Why do we get an extra day every four years? The answer is in the way the Earth moves around the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="imageframe" style="float:left; width:158px;"><a href="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/milankovitchcycle.gif" rel="lightbox" title="milankovitchcycle.gif"><img src="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/milankovitchcycle.thumbnail.gif" width="158" height="200" alt="milankovitchcycle.gif" /></a>
<div class="imagecaption">courtesy of ASU deptarments of Geography and Computer Science</div>
</div>
<p>This year, February 29 appears on the calendar. That&#8217;s because 2008 is a leap year. It&#8217;s just an easy way to keep our calendars clear and consistent.</p>
<p>Why do we get an extra day every four years? The answer is in the way the Earth moves around the Sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2008/02/11/the-science-ofleap-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realscience.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/science_of_leap_year_021108.mp3" length="2817463" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:03:55</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
courtesy of ASU deptarments of Geography and Computer Science

This year, February 29 appears on the calendar. That&#8217;s because 2008 is a leap year. It&#8217;s just an easy way to keep our calendars clear and consistent.
Why do we get an extra [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
courtesy of ASU deptarments of Geography and Computer Science

This year, February 29 appears on the calendar. That&#8217;s because 2008 is a leap year. It&#8217;s just an easy way to keep our calendars clear and consistent.
Why do we get an extra day every four years? The answer is in the way the Earth moves around the Sun.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Podcast, SciClips</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Michael Bradbury/REALscience</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Science on iTunes (at long last)</title>
		<link>http://www.realscience.us/2007/04/03/real-science-on-itunes-at-long-last/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realscience.us/2007/04/03/real-science-on-itunes-at-long-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bradbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science of...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR's Science Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realscience.us/2007/04/03/real-science-on-itunes-at-long-last/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
REAL Science is going live on iTunes!
REAL Science is available at iTunes. Because we are new and have little ranking, you must search by name to subscribe. Thanks to all of you intrepid subscribers who continually send e-mail asking when this will happen. We are so excited to be listed among the 60 (and counting) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.realscience.us/images/webbanner1.png" alt="REAL Science logo" /><br />
REAL Science is going live on iTunes!</p>
<p>REAL Science is available at iTunes. Because we are new and have little ranking, you must search by name to subscribe. Thanks to all of you intrepid subscribers who continually send e-mail asking when this will happen. We are so excited to be listed among the 60 (and counting) podcasts that find their home in the Science &#038; Medicine category of iTunes. With your help, we&#8217;ll jump to the top of the stack along side the New York Times&#8217; Science Times and NPR&#8217;s Science Friday.</p>
<p>We can also be found in many blog and podcast directories, including: <a href="http://www.bloghints.com/">BLOG DIRECTORY, Submit blog free, Promote Blog, Best directory</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realscience.us/2007/04/03/real-science-on-itunes-at-long-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.659 seconds -->
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown: open(/var/sessions/sess_ffc7cec13cd69492ad4fbdabe4a324b6, O_RDWR) failed: No such file or directory (2) in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/var/sessions) in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />

